It's nigh on two years ago now, but I can still remember those  moments with awful clarity. The first was then-Presidential candidate  John McCain referring to America's financial situation by claiming "the  fundamentals of our economy are strong". My eyebrow raised, and not for  the reason you'd think. It wasn't so much what he said that surprised me  (I came to expect statements like that from him at that stage) but the  very specific phrasing he used.
A couple of weeks later, in an  economic debate, he did it again. At one point on the topic of fiscal  rectitude he said that he would veto any budget Congress proposed that  wasn't balanced, before pulling out the pen he said he'd use to do it.  That time, I actually gasped with incredulity. John McCain had  shamelessly nicked bits from The West Wing twice in a matter of weeks.
While  it showed that somebody in his staff watched the show, it also showed  they didn't watch it that carefully. The first line was a verbatim quote  of Jed Bartlet from the first series, after which he was admonished by a  staffer for answering the question "like an economics professor with a  big ol' stick up his butt". The second, even more brazen snatch was from  the final series debate for Bartlet's successor, where Republican  candidate Arnie Vinick showed us all his vetoing biro. Vinick lost the  election. Go figure.
In a way though, I find it hard to blame him: if I were running an election, I'd want it to be like  The West Wing  too. The show might have ended four years so, but its effect still  looms large. Barack Obama was every inch a West Winger's candidate in  2008, a Bartlet/Santos hybrid who'd deliver us from the slack-jawed  calamity that was the Bush administration. Even now, half way into his  first term, I find myself not judging Obama against Clinton or Carter or  Kennedy, but Bartlet. At a time when real-life politics feels to be  both tear-inducing and hair-reducing, The West Wing is the Platonic ideal plane to which we can aspire.
It's  not just the feel and tone of the show itself that's relentlessly  stylized, but its characters are as driven and honourable as they are  well-drawn. With most political comedies and dramas the focus is on  either the incompetence or brazen amorality of the characters involved,  not so in the Bartlet White House. Amongst the very first scenes we see  in the whole series are of speechwriter Sam Seaborn having a late  working drink with a reporter and leaving a bedfellow at 5am to go into  the office. The first episode in no small part revolves around Sam  obsessing over gentlemanly impropriety. The hours senior staff work are  staggering, their devotion to cause absolute. But the genius of the show  is in showing that though their work ethic is superhuman, the effects  of that devotion aren't always happily ever after.
One of the most  stark moments in the series is Chief of Staff Leo McGarry telling his  (soon to be ex) wife with remarkable definition that his job was more  important than his marriage right now. All of his colleagues have seen  their personal lives similarly pillaged. But in a building that was  described by one character as "not very conducive to relationships", the  separate and collective bonds between the characters, as well as their  own individual capacity to handle their workloads with such wit and  grace and sleep deprivation, are truly special.
First among them  is the relationship between the President and Leo: close counsel and  best friends. Even though Leo only ever addresses the President by his  first name twice in 155 episodes, their friendship is both clear to see  and pivotal to the smooth working of the administration. Jed Bartlet may  be in so many ways the ideal President, but without Leo's help he would  never have got there. And for all Leo's cranky world weariness, he  invariably gets the most inspiring lines. His vainglorious and abrasive  deputy Josh Lyman knows that better than anyone: Leo's handling of  Josh's post-traumatic stress could draw tears from a fossil. Beyond the  paternal instincts of Jed and Leo towards the rest of their senior staff  there's the sibling love and rivalry between them: the often strained  relationship between Josh and the mercurial Communications Director Toby  Ziegler, every inch a big brother, is balanced by the degree to which  Josh and Toby's deputy Sam are on the same page. All three of them treat  the press secretary, CJ Cregg, with flirtatious awe. And rightly so.  Given the current prevalence at the moment of the Twilight  series, where Kristen Stewart's sole purpose seems to be seen, not heard  and coloured almost entirely by the manbeast she chooses, it's  gratifying to see a woman character with such depth and strength.
The  main cast is one thing, but the quality of the secondary characters are  a marvellous flourish: the deeply conservative but entirely earnest  Ainsley Hayes, the sage soldier Admiral Fitzwallace, the irrepressible  Lord John Marbury, the marvellous hell-raiser Amy Gardner and  innumerable others besides. It's such a capable satellite cast that  makes the world they inhabit so believable.
As does the show's  development over time. Some characters move on, others take on more  stature than originally planned (the indispensible Donna Moss was, like  so many classic TV characters, only originally meant to be a bit-part),  the issues change as do the relationship dynamics, but never at the  show's expense. A lot is made of the difference of the writing between  series 4 and 5, the time at which series creator Aaron Sorkin left the  show, and while he was a massive loss as far as I'm concerned the  difference was negligible. The whole point of the show is that every  staffer employed at the White House is working towards an ideal bigger  than themselves, and no matter how talented any of them are, they're not  irreplaceable, and the show will keep on going. That goes for Sorkin as  much as anyone.
As a general theme in fact The West Wing  deals with adversity and contention very well. Whereas in real life  American politics where antipathy between political opponents is at  boiling point, the Bartlet White House are often frustrated with  congressional Republicans, but also very generous. When the Senate  Majority Leader has an disastrous interview with a local TV station, the  President urges CJ to go easy on him; he's a conscientious man. He  treats a renegade General intent on criticising him publicly with  similar grace. When Ainsley Hayes comes to work at the White House  (hired due to her sense of duty, no less) the initially weary staff  rally to her defence when she's ill-treated for her party preference.  Even her initial quandary of serving an administration whose policies  she couldn't stand was handled with marvellous magnanimity by, as is  usually the case, Leo. "The President is asking you to serve. And  everything else is crap".
That ultimately is the point of  The West Wing.  It shows a picture of life that although stylized is close enough to  reality to think or hope it attainable. It shows that great things are  possible when people use the courage of their convictions and the  capacity of their minds. It's both topical and timeless. It is  aspirational and inspirational art at its finest. And it serves at your  pleasure.
 
This is really classic, I enjoy watching The West Wing and I have the complete collection at home, I can watch about 6-7 parts in a roll.
ReplyDeleteI searched the net for you and found a source that works. Although once you are there try to select a US location for the video as some of them didn't work and led me all over the net.
ReplyDeletewow game card
I just seen the 2 seasons and this was really fantastic drama show. I'll follow the rest seasons online.
ReplyDelete